In some ways, this piece is framed as a part 2 to the post titled “Responding to the Pope’s Message.” Think of it as a call-to-action before action is needed kind of post.
In the summers of 2002, 2003, and 2004, I taught a few summer classes for the Upward Bound program at Millersville University. One class was about using PDAs as a function of time management, the other was a multimedia and web design class. In the last summer of my teaching, the PDA class was swapped out for teaching a class on developing and learning how to navigate the Internet. In this class, I walked the students how to do things such as evaluate web sources when they are doing research, how to use keywords for searching, how to setup and investigate domain names, and how to create simple web sites.
Now, I started teaching the classes because I wanted to see the potential of mobile in education. What happened though is that I began to understand what it was that students were getting in respect to the technological side of their education. And to be honest, I’m largely self-taught when it comes to tech; so knowing what they were getting would better prepare me for those whom I’d encounter in the world outside of me.
What I saw in that last summer is that students were ill-prepared to deal with the realities of a connected culture. The university library was still teaching – yes in 2004 – that you only knew a veritable web resource because it had a .org or .edu name on the URL. There was little to no understanding at all towards this sphere at all. And that was very scary.
Coming into MMM, one of the statements that gets thrown this way is the idea that learning and applying the Bible will continue in the same ways that it always has. That despite the technology, that there will be the same core skills. And to some extent that’s correct and incorrect at the same time.
In this piece at the Britannica blog the question is asked if technology is going to evolve to the point where the written language will become obsolete? And if it does render the written language as such, what are the skillsets that would have to be understood – not only in education, but all of life – towards maneuvering this ultra-connected space?
A few items from this piece jumped out, but this one really nailed things:
…It’s not enough for new devices, systems, and gizmos to simply be more expedient than what they are replacing… We owe it to posterity to demand proof that people’s communications will be more intelligent, persuasive, and constructive when they occur over digital media.” When confronted by the statistic that fewer than 50% of high-school seniors could differentiate between an objective Web site and a biased source, Norvig replied that he did perceive it as a problem, and astonishingly suggested that the solution was to get rid of reading instruction altogether. “We’re used to teaching reading, writing, and arithmetic; now we should be teaching these evaluation skills in school,” Norvig told me. “Some of it could be just-in-time. Education, search engines themselves should be providing clues for this…
Framed in the spirit of this site’s mission (the intersection of faith and mobile technology), we could say (as framed in the reflective post some days ago):
So what does it mean to have believers who have instant access to multiple resource and communities, who seek answers to the questions of faith and life, evaluating sources in real-time through online and offline relationships, instead of waiting for a sermon or preacher to smooth the message.
I’m speaking of this connected space where the conversation is just as important as the reading itself. What are we doing to prepare religion/faith for that kind of transformation? Or rather, should be we preparing for that kind of transformation?
The Word of God – the Bible – is the probably most consistent piece of oral/written/digital communication used by Westernized nations. Its literally the thread that holds spiritual, moral, legal, and sociological bonds (am not debating whether a person is a Christian or not, only that the Christian influence has been that pervasive). When the fabric of how we transmit the message of the Gospel is purely digital (text, audio, and video) and native to the generation that is using it, does the way that we teach also get a new pair of clothes?
Let me be clear, I’m not advocating that we change the Bible, traditions of the faith, nor the tenants of local and para-churches. I’m asking – as I sat in a class with kids who are now graduates of college in many cases today – are we teaching Biblical literacy in light of the abilities of the generation, or holding fast to something older, and not so effective, because of some fear of irrelevance?
And if we are on-point in teaching Biblical points and principles correctly for this generation and the one(s) to come, should we be asking the same of the institutions and culture in which we live whom may not have adapted such?
The post quoted here is from Britannica’s Leaning & Literacy in the Digital Age blog series. There’s a lot more that can be said given the depth of materials posted in this series, but I leave it to you the reader to intersect with the entirety of this content.